Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Masur vs Constantin Frantzen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Masur vs Frantzen analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Masur vs Constantin Frantzen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Masur 1 - 0 Frantzen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Masur has won 50.59% of points on their second serve, while Frantzen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Masur, in recent form, has won 51.87% of their opponent's second serve points, while Frantzen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.24% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Masur has saved 65.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Frantzen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Masur has won 67.57% of matches played (W/L 50/ 24), with Frantzen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Masur has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 136/ 105), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 9/ 13). Frantzen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Masur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.36% of matches (W/L 29/ 10), where as Frantzen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Masur winning 1 times and Frantzen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Masur winning 2 and Frantzen winning 0. The last match between Masur and Frantzen was at the Augsburg Challenger, 20-08-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Daniel Masur getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:2.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Masur and Frantzen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Masur winning 0 times and Frantzen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Masur winning 0, and Frantzen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Masur has played against opponents with an average rank of 198.92 while Frantzen has played against players with an average rank of 183.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Masur has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Frantzen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Masur has converted 43.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Frantzen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
300
Rank
176
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
58% (387-282)
Career Total W/L
53% (34-30)
74% (35-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$151,200
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniel Masur vs Constantin Frantzen For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Masur VS Frantzen
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Daniel Masur | Constantin Frantzen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 12 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:2 | 1:14:2 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (30/52) | 55% (36/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (25/30) | 75% (27/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (15/22) | 43% (13/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (26/66) | 23% (12/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Daniel Masur
Player
Constantin Frantzen
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Masur | Constantin Frantzen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (35/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 70% (77/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (615/471) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 85% (28/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 261 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 128 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:22 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 177.74 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (2162/3344) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (1626/2162) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (598/1182) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (153/350) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1365/3450) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (23/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 74% (35/47) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (13/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (9/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (38/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (38/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Daniel Masur
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
12
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Hernan Casanova
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Daniel Masur
74%
(
73 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
79 of
115)
28
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
106
Total Points Won
108
|
1-6 7-6(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
14
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
106)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Daniel Masur
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Lucas Gerch
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Vilius Gaubas
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Constantin Frantzen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Constantin Frantzen
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roko Horvat
Player
Constantin Frantzen
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roy Smith
Player
Constantin Frantzen
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
13
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
43 of
54)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
14 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(6) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constantin Frantzen
Player
Omni Kumar
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
43%
(
41 of
96)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
106
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Constantin Frantzen
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Constantin Frantzen
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
15
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Constantin Frantzen
Player
Taym Alazmeh
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
11 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Constantin Frantzen
Player
Milan Welte
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Masur Vs Frantzen Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Masur are available here and Frantzen photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
